Health Inequality Analysis

Health Inequality Analysis

Health Inequality Analysis

Exploring Health Inequality across local authorities in England

• Completed Project

Role

Role

Data Analyst

Data Analyst

Category

Category

Public Health

Public Health

Client

Client

Independent Project

Independent Project

Overview

Health inequality refers to the avoidable and unfair differences in health outcomes, access to healthcare, and wider determinants of health between different groups or areas.

I brought together demographic, socioeconomic, clinical, environmental and healthcare-access indicators to investigate how health outcomes vary between areas and how wider determinants may contribute to these differences.

Project Walkthrough
Hear me talk through this project -->
0:00 / 0:00
Project Walkthrough
Hear me talk through this project -->
0:00 / 0:00
Project Walkthrough
Hear me talk through this project -->
0:00 / 0:00
A person in a white pinstripe suit sitting in a vibrant field of orange flowers under a bright blue sky.

The Challenge

Health outcomes are shaped by many connected factors, but the relevant data is often stored across different sources and geographical levels.

The challenge was to combine these datasets into one consistent view and use them to better understand differences between local authorities.

Extreme close-up black and white portrait focusing on the eyes and freckled skin of a person’s face with soft lighting.

Research and Methodology

I brought together public datasets covering life expectancy, deprivation, ethnicity, healthcare access, vaccination uptake, GP populations and environmental conditions.

The data was cleaned, standardised and joined at local-authority level before being explored through statistical analysis and interactive visualisations.

For example, childhood vaccination data was reported quarterly rather than cumulatively. To estimate annual coverage, I first combined the quarterly denominators:

Annual denominator = Q1 + Q2 + Q3 + Q4

I then calculated a weighted annual coverage rate:

Weighted coverage = (Q1 rate × Q1 denominator + Q2 rate × Q2 denominator + Q3 rate × Q3 denominator + Q4 rate × Q4 denominator) ÷ Annual denominator

This ensured quarters with larger eligible populations contributed proportionally to the final annual figure.

Findings

Deprivation showed the clearest relationship with life expectancy, with more deprived areas experiencing the poorer outcomes.

However, healthcare access and other local indicators did not follow one simple pattern. Some areas performed better or worse than expected, suggesting that health inequality is shaped by several overlapping social, clinical and environmental factors.

The dashboard also made it possible to compare individual local authorities and see where similar areas differed across multiple indicators.

High-contrast black and white portrait of a person wearing sunglasses and a textured head covering.

Reflections

This project strengthened my experience in combining complex public datasets, working across different geographical levels and creating comparable measures from data reported in different formats.

It also reinforced the importance of being careful when interpreting relationships in health data — particularly the difference between identifying an association and claiming that one factor directly causes another.

Conclusions

The project showed that health inequality cannot be explained by one measure alone.

Deprivation was a major factor, but demographic, healthcare and environmental conditions also helped provide a fuller picture of why outcomes differ between areas.

CONTACT

CONTACT

CONTACT

I’m open to roles, projects and collaborations that challenge me to learn, create and contribute to meaningful work.